欢迎！这里是 PhecStar 站点首页
首页并没有什么可以放的。因此，窃以蒂迈欧在开篇对苏格拉底等人所作的论述作为首页的引子
Now, in my opinion, we must first make the following division: what is
that which always is and has no becoming, and what is that which is
always becoming but never is?
(余以为，首当辨者：恒在而不变者何也？常变而无实存者何也？)
The
former is graspable by intellect with the aid of reason, being always
the same, whereas the latter is opinable by opinion with the aid of
unreasoning sensation, becoming and perishing, but never really
being.
(夫恒在者，智以理得之，常而不易也。夫变在者，感以见知之，其生灭无常，流转不居，而未尝有定在也。)
Plato, “Timaeus,” 28a.
(柏拉图，“蒂迈欧篇,” 28a.)